The Global Citizen

We make our friends. We make our enemies. God makes our neighbors.
G.K. Chesterton

Is there a great moral nation,
the only justification
of a material one?

Walt Whitman

The Global Citizen is published in conjunction with The McGill Report, where international news is a good local story.

BEST BITS
Global Citizenship
Minnesota
America
Iraq
China
9/11 & Islam
Immigration
Media Criticism
Space & God
Libs & Cons

GLOBAL MINNESOTA

E-Mail

GLOBAL CITIZENRY
Cursor
Powerline
James Lileks
Shot in the Dark
FratersLibertas
Denis Horgan
Segac's World
One Hand Clapping
Ruminate This
Roger L. Simon
Busy Busy Busy
MaxSpeak
David Warren
Sean LaFreniere
Pierre's Web
BuzzMachine
The Daily Howler
Kieran Healy
Smart Genes
Zonitics
Michael J. Totten
Matt Welch
This Modern World
Virginia Postrel
Orcinus
The O'Toole File
GailOnline
Li'l Green Footballs
TBOGG
Volokh Conspiracy
Armed Liberal
Brink Lindsey
CalPundit
Junius
Andrew Sullivan
InstaPundit

MEDIA NEWS
Jim Romenesko
Howard Kurtz
The Drudge Report

11.26.2002

WHERE SMART MEN HAVE GONE BEFORE: "Conservatism," writes William F. Buckely in Up from Liberalism, "is the tacit acknowledgement that all that is finally important in human experience is behind us; that the crucial explorations have been undertaken, and that it is given to man to know what are the great truths that emerged from them. Whatever is to come cannot outweigh the importance to man of what has gone before." Now here is a prime example of a mystico-religious sentiment, with the eschatalogical "all that is finally important" broadly hinting that repentance and redemption is the process that's under discussion. But what has this spiritual transformation to do with politics, with law, with compromise and splitting differences, and with the muddling through each day which is the only consummation we can hope for in daily human life? This is my problem with conservatism. Not that I don't believe every word of what Buckley says, on the religious plane. It's just that as politics these ideas aim way too high, or, I'd guess you'd say, way too deep, to be useful as a foundational principle for consensual political life. The idea that man is, if not a perfectible being, at least an improveable one, is much the better axiom on which to base social life. Hope for a raise, rather than to be spiritually raised, is the greater motivation for the greater part of mankind. Hope for improvement in the here and now, and not the hereafter, gets most of mankind out of bed in the morning and out the door to do a good day's work. If America has shown anything in its 200 years, it's shown that such improvement is possible. That's a victory for the liberal idea.